Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Granite

Slab manufacture

1. Wire saw
http://www.laddresearch.com/New_Products/Materials_Processing_Equipment/Wire_Saw__Model_L850/wire_saw__model_l850.html
http://www.wire-saw-machines.com/Diamond_wire_saw/2009/0917/Diamond_Wire_Saw_for_Granite_Slab_Multi_.html
http://www.krishnastonetech.com/multimachine.html
http://www.pellegrini.net/INGLESE/attrezzature_cava_ING.html

2. Gang saw
http://www.kvcindia.com/clients/aaexporter/Gang_Saw.htm


3. Grinding / polishing /resining

Settore pietre naturali
India meridionale
Mr. NARAYAN H. RANGANATH
Thimmashettappa Complex
Behind Hotel Dwaraka
Vivekananda Road
572101 Tumkur - Karnataka
Tel. (0091) 0816 2277869
Fax (0091) 0816 2277869
Cell. 0091 9844153275
pedrini@vsnl.net

Mr. V.K. Bhati B-1 Ground Floor
Arihant Apartment
Bedla Badgaon Link Road
313001 Udaipur- India
Tel. 0091-294-2451290
Fax. 0091-294-2451290
Cell. 0091 94141 32577
pedindia@gmail.com

Italian Granito company

1. http://www.cremar.it/home_eng.php
2. http://www.mirage.it/index.jsp?language=en

3. http://www.jstone.it/index_en.html
4. http://www.granito.it/granito2.html
5. http://www.cmgsrl.it/Default.asp?lang=en
6. http://www.cmgsrl.it/usato/default.asp?id=44
7. http://www.irisfmg.it/
8. http://www.stonev.com/products/countertop.htm
9. http://www.breton.it/dynamic/en/index.php?coverSection=stonesmachines&
10. http://www.pedrini-italia.it/home.php

11. http://www.giorginimaggi.it/storia.htm

12. http://www.simecsrl.it/

13. http://www.gmm.it/it/gmm_storia.asp

 
 



Stone Knowledge - -- Various Defects of Natural Stone To be Aware of


Shade variation - Slabs / tiles should be sorted to ensure uniformity of shade. Normally, any colour can be sorted into three shades. Sorting is simple -just lay all the material on the floor and look from different directions.
If you will buy the entire quantity over a period of time,then you should make it a point to know from which specific quarry the material will be supplied as there will always be a difference between quarries.
Grain variation - If grain varies between fine and coarse, such tiles / slabs should also be sorted uniformly by grain size. Sort this the same way as for shade. The further you see it from, the easier it is to sort.
Oiling - Many black granites are light blacks.To make them temporarily look better (blacker), industrial oil is rubbed on it after polishing.This oil evaporates after some months leaving the slab looking very shabby. A burning match will heat an oiled surface and the oil will rub off on your finger.
Colouring - Similarly, red oxide is put on red granites to make them look redder and to fill cracks. To check this, rub the surface hard with your finger and see if some red colour rubs off. By wetting the sawn surface(back side of polished piece), you can see the true colour and nature of any granite.
Colour patches - These are darker or lighter patches or bands of single colours due to mineral localisation; in black this occurs as "oil patches"-patches which look as if oil has been spilled. These are actually permanent patches. Pay less for such materials.
After laying and seeing from different angles, it is easy to see which pieces have these defects. Tapping with your finger nails or spoon may give different sounds on these patches compared to rest of the granite.
Double colour - Sometimes two different grain sizes occur in the same slab, giving the appearance of a double colour. Pay less for such materials.
Cracks - Test by pouring water, wiping and letting dry. Water which goes into a crack evaporates last.
Staining - Many granites stain. Test before buying with wet spices or oil kept on it for a few minutes. Even if staining is not your worry, if you are going to wash the surface frequently, then check how long tap water remains absorbed. Some granites change colour when wet compared with when dry. Since drying is a slow process, the surface looks unattractive during the interim period when part of it is wet and part is dry.
Holes - Some crystallic granites do not have a smooth surface. The surface chips or there are pin-holes. Avoid this type for horizontal applications.
Having decided on a particular granite, it is important to note that shade and grain should be uniform in the entire lot and there should be no colour patches. Do not accept anyone saying that "this is not possible because granite is a natural material". If entire material is from one quarry, it is a simple matter.
Accept defects only to put in hidden places.

Surface Finishes of Beautiful Natural Stone

There are many different types of stone available today. When stone is ordered, it is fabricated with a particular type of surface. There are six main type of surfaces that are selected:

Honed: Provides a flat to low sheen gloss. Different levels of gloss can be selected. This surface is very smooth, but often very porous. This texture is common in high traffic buildings. Honed floors should always be protected with Penetrating Sealer because it has wide-open pores. Honed stone colors are not as vibrant as polished stone.

Polished: A glossy surfaces that wears away with time due to heavy foot traffic and using improper maintenance procedure. This surface is very smooth and not porous. The reflectively of polished crystals brings out the brilliant colors and grains of natural stone. The shine comes from the natural reflection of the stone's crystals. The shine is due to polishing bricks and polishing powders used during fabrication. The Shine is not from a coating.

Flamed: A rough surface that is developed through heat. During fabrication, the stone is heated up and the crystals begin to pop, thus forming a rough surface. This surface is very porous and must be treated with an impregnator.

Sand Blasted: This surface is the result of a pressurized flow of sand water that provides a textured surface with a matte gloss.

Sawn: A Process performed by using a gang saw.

Bush Hammered: A pounding action that develops a textured surface. The degree of roughness can be selected.

Regardless of the type of surface to be maintained, all stone should be protected with sealers.

Applications of Granite Slabs and Tiles


Granites in the commercial sense are hard natural stones which are polishable and need to be worked on by harder tools than for marble for cutting, shaping and polishing. They are usually suitable for interior and exterior use. Thus have different geological origins and minerals. Petrographically, they are either magmatic or metamorphic rocks.
The beauty of granite coupled with its physical strength and chemical resistance, makes it the material of choice in construction applications.
Floors :

Slabs look better than tiles. Check material for staining, water absorption and rusting. Consider surface finishes other than polished. Darker colours preferable in commercial areas.
Free lengths can be used.
Walls :
Slabs look much better than tiles. Surface finishes other than polished can be consider for external walls. Keep weight in mind.
Skirtings at bottom of wall :

Long thin slabs can be used. Finishes other than polished can be used.
Window sills / Door and window frames :

Slab edges can be rounded or chamfered, and polished.
Kitchen Platforms - home :
Fine grain material looks better than coarse grain. Material should be checked for staining, water absorption and pin holes. Front edges of slabs can be rounded and polished, or water-restraining strip can be put. For backsplash area, use granite strips in lengths matching the countertop lengths.
Kitchen Platforms - commercial :

Defective material can be used to lower the cost since hygiene is the main consideration.
Bathroom Platforms :
Rounding of edges or cut-out of basins should be got done from a professional company.
Counter Tops :
3 cm thick slabs look better than 2 cm ones. Front edge can be profiled and shaped and polished.
Shelves e.g for showpieces at home / shops :

Tiles or thin slabs with both surfaces polished can be used. Edges can be rounded or chamfered, and polished.
Standing Dividers :
Edges can be rounded or chamfered, and polished.
Table Tops and other furniture :

Buy only when completed including the edges and the legs.
Nameplates :
Fine-grain black granite with edges chamfered gives the best contrast with the lettering.

Granite is quarried in blocks which are cut into tiles or slabs.
For Tiles, sizes are 2' x 1'. Standard thickness is 10 +/-1 mm. Tiles are cut in machines which accomodate only small blocks of size just greater than 2' x 1'.
For Slabs, blocks of required length and width are cut in vertical saws. These generally use a 2 meter diameter disc thus giving slabs up to 2'6" wide and 10 ft. long. Standard thickness is 18 +/- 1.5 mm.
For Wider slabs, the blocks are cut in a gangsaw. Slabs upto 11' x 6' can be obtained. The standard thickness of gangsaw cut slabs is 20+ / 1 mm.

Some key points about Granite countertops


As reported,One third of every new home built in the US has a granite countertop.Granite countertop especially the solid style seems more and more popular in the construction field.But when you are choosing granite for your customers or for your own house, there are some key points to be noted:
Granite is a product of nature. This makes it subject to variations in both colour, texture and shade. Small samples of granite are only representative of and not indicative of selected material.
It is important to see and select the slabs that will be used to make your countertop, particularly when choosing granites such as Baltic Brown, Emerald Pearl, Balmoral Red,Ubatuba Green and Rosso Porrino which are regarded as being of more open variety than others.
The cost of your granite countertop will largely depend on the type of granite you choose, together with scale and detail of your kitchen.
The price of granite is primarily dependent on availability and source of origin.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Broadband Availability to Expand

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is seeking to nearly double the wireless communications spectrum available for commercial use over the next 10 years, an effort that could greatly enhance the ability of consumers to send and receive video and data with smartphones and other hand-held devices.

President Obama will sign a presidential memorandum on Monday that aims to make available for auction some 500 megahertz of spectrum that is now controlled by the federal government and private companies, administration officials said Sunday. Most of that would be designated for commercial use in mobile broadband and similar applications, though aspects of the plan will require Congressional approval.

The effort embraces recommendations made by the Federal Communications Commission in its National Broadband Plan, which was released in March and encourages the expansion of high-speed wireless broadband services.

But some aspects could be opposed by television broadcast companies, which will be asked if they want to give up some of their spectrum for auction. Cable companies that have invested heavily in wired telecommunications networks could also lose from the new direction.

Proceeds from the auctions would go in part to finance the construction of improved communications systems for police, fire and other public safety agencies. Law enforcement agencies have proposed that parts of the newly available wireless spectrum be used for a dedicated broadband public safety network.

Roughly 45 percent of the spectrum to be auctioned would come from federal government agencies that will be asked to give up allocations that they are not using or could share, according to administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to upstage the announcement.

The remainder would come from unused spectrum already scheduled for auction or from broadcasters and other spectrum licensees who would be offered incentives to give up or share parts of their communications airwaves. Currently, the spectrum for wireless communications is about 547 megahertz.

Lawrence H. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council and assistant to the president for economic policy, is expected to detail the broadband effort in a lunchtime speech in Washington to the New America Foundation, a public policy institute.

“This initiative will catalyze private sector investment, contribute to economic growth, and help to create hundreds of thousands of jobs,” Mr. Summers said in a statement. “This policy is a win three times over. It creates prosperity and jobs while at the same time raising revenue for public purposes like public safety and increasing our ability to compete internationally.”

While it is not unexpected that the Obama administration would embrace some of the recommendations of the National Broadband Plan, the announcement is significant because it puts momentum behind actions that the F.C.C. does not have the authority to take on its own.

Specifically, the presidential memorandum will direct the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to identify federally controlled communications bands that can be made available within five years for exclusive or shared use by commercial companies.

Negotiations have been continuing between the White House and federal departments including defense, justice, state, Treasury and energy, which use dedicated government spectrum for official and classified communications.

The administration is expected to ask Congress to approve the use of some of the proceeds from an auction of federal spectrum to finance the upgrading of government communications equipment and systems.

Congress would also need to approve the F.C.C.’s use of so-called incentive auctions of spectrum that is already allocated to private companies, including broadcast networks. Those auctions would pay broadcast networks and others to give up unused portions of the spectrum that they license from the federal government, which would then be licensed to or shared with wireless companies.

Finally, Congress would have to designate how the money generated by auctions should be spent. The plan seeks to use some of the proceeds to build the public safety network that would allow police and fire departments from different jurisdictions to talk to one another in emergencies — something that generally is not possible now and that was identified as an issue on 9/11.

Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the F.C.C. and an Obama appointee, welcomed the administration’s initiative on Sunday. “The administration’s strong actions on wireless broadband will move us significantly toward sustainable economic success, robust investment, and global leadership in innovation,” he said.

In the long term, companies that are developing emerging wireless technologies could benefit from the greater availability of wireless spectrum, industry analysts say. Consumers also could benefit from the actions, as wireless communications continue to improve and more convenient devices are made widely available.

Some spectrum also would be made available for free, unlicensed use by start-up companies and others, administration officials said. Such unlicensed spectrum has previously helped in the development of cordless phones, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth applications.

Harold Feld, legal director of Public Knowledge, a consumer-oriented policy group, said the interest of consumers will be most helped by auctions that help to promote competition between wireless companies rather than entrenching the dominant providers in the market.

Since the release of the F.C.C.’s broadband plan, some broadcasters have expressed doubts about the spectrum allocation recommendations. Dennis Wharton, an executive vice president at the National Association of Broadcasters, said that while expanding broadband is important, it should not be done at the expense of broadcasting, which provides free, local television service to tens of millions of Americans.

“We appreciate F.C.C. assurances that further reclamation of broadcast television spectrum will be completely voluntary,” Mr. Wharton said.

With the recent conversion of analog broadcast signals to digital, broadcasters returned 108 megahertz of spectrum to the government for auction. Some of the wireless companies that bought that spectrum have not developed all of it, leaving broadcasters wary of giving up more of their holdings to companies that might simply warehouse it, industry officials say.

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Bangalore City Traffic Police.

It’s a bit hard to make out the headline, but it says, as blood gushes from the receive, “Don’t talk while she drives.” Scary. Emotional. And maybe even effective. (HT: Adam Gard)

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Graham Hill: Why I'm a weekday vegetarian | Video on TED.com

This TED Talk has been recommended to you by vkgopu@gmail.com from TED.com.

Note from sender:
Graham Hill is the founder of TreeHugger.com; he travels the world to tell the story of sustainability

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Thursday, April 15, 2010

CRYOGENIC ENGINE MADE IN INDIA GOING TO SUCCEED IN ONE YEAR

ISRO’S CRYOGENIC ENGINE

Cryogenic Engine which was made in India  after 16 years all components which are used in the rocket is Indian made , This engine was designed by Russian in 1991 India enters contract with Russia to supply cryogenic engine to India, All legal formalities are completed even Russia decided to supply but in 1993 US  forced Russia not to supply cryogenic engine even Russia want bank from the deal .

From that movement ISRO Scientist decided to build Indian made cryogenic engine, from launch pad up to stage 2  vehicle went good when it was changing to cryogenic engine its validity was changed from the already expected direction up to 500 seconds signal from the vehicle was proper after that it deviate from the direction , Next for few minutes from  ISRO no communication then finally ISRO Chairman said that some problem in third stage ( cryogenic engine)  expected distant was not covered and in his few words he said that “ WITH IN ONE ISRO IS GOING TO LAUNCH   GSLV WITH CRYOGENIC ENGINE “ Thanks to ladies and gentile man who work for this project .

The Whole Truth

Work on developing a cryogenic engine was initiated shortly after the project to develop the Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) was launched in 1986. The GSLV is capable of placing a 2 ton satellite into a geostationary transfer orbit (GTO).

Initially ISRO scientists attempted to develop a cryogenic engine on their own. However, having made no progress, in 1991 ISRO entered into a $120 million contract with Glavkosmos for the supply of two KVD-1 cryogenic engines and the complete transfer of technology for those engines.

The KVD-1 is the one and only oxygen/hydrogen liquid-propellant rocket engine in Russia known to have passed through full-scale ground testing routine. KVD-1's prototype known as 11D56 was developed between 1965-1972 by the Design Bureau of Chemical Machine-Building ( KB Khimmash) for the fourth stage of a future version of heavy Lunar N-1 launch vehicle. Bench trials of the engine commenced in 1966.

The KVD-1 engine is a single-chambered unit with a turbo pump system designed to feed propellants; and includes afterburning: a feature characteristic of any powerful Russian liquid-propellant rocket engine design. The engine can be used in cryogenic upper stages designed to put payloads into high-altitude elliptical, geostationary orbits or escape trajectories.

US Sanctions

In 1993 the US leaned on Russia to cancel its contract with ISRO and stop any transfer of technology for developing cryogenic engines, citing violation of the MTCR regime. Indeed, the US imposed sanctions on both Glavkosmos as well as ISRO for the violation. The then Russian president, Boris Yelstin, yielded to American pressure and directed Glavkosmos to renegotiate its contract with ISRO to exclude transfer of technology. The renegotiated contract provisioned only for outright sale of two KVD-1 engines. Satisfied, the Americans lifted sanctions on Glavkosmos and ISRO.

Despite the renegotiation, in the years that followed, ISRO continued to exude confidence in its ability to develop the cryogenic engine on its own. Some of the confidence stemmed from the fact that significant elements of the manufacturing know-how needed to design and construct cryogenic engines had in fact been already transferred to India by 1993 when the contract was renegotiated. In March 1994, Dr. U. R. Rao of ISRO admitted that ISRO would benefit from design drawings and other information obtained under the original contract and from the extensive training that its engineers received in Russia. The continued presence of Russian space technicians at ISRO in connection with the outright supply of the two KVD-1 engines provided ISRO a conduit to the source of KVD-1 technology.

However, despite its confidence ISRO faltered when it was faced with the production of special alloys and high-speed turbines required for cryogenic fuels and it became evident that delays in the production of the KVD-1 derivative would affect the GSLV launch schedule. Consequently, in December 2001 India entered into an agreement with Khrunichev Space Centre for supply of five additional KVD-1 engines for its GSLV program.

When Khrunichev announced its deal with ISRO it also stated that Russia and India would collaborate on further development of the booster. The statement seems to suggest that Khrunichev will continue assisting ISRO with the development of its CUS

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Monday, April 12, 2010

Looting Main Street

How the nation's biggest banks are ripping off American cities with the same predatory deals that brought down Greece

MATT TAIBBI

Posted Mar 31, 2010 8:15 AM

If you want to know what life in the Third World is like, just ask Lisa Pack, an administrative assistant who works in the roads and transportation department in Jefferson County, Alabama. Pack got rudely introduced to life in post-crisis America last August, when word came down that she and 1,000 of her fellow public employees would have to take a little unpaid vacation for a while. The county, it turned out, was more than $5 billion in debt — meaning that courthouses, jails and sheriff's precincts had to be closed so that Wall Street banks could be paid.

As public services in and around Birmingham were stripped to the bone, Pack struggled to support her family on a weekly unemployment check of $260. Nearly a fourth of that went to pay for her health insurance, which the county no longer covered. She also fielded calls from laid-off co-workers who had it even tougher. "I'd be on the phone sometimes until two in the morning," she says. "I had to talk more than one person out of suicide. For some of the men supporting families, it was so hard — foreclosure, bankruptcy. I'd go to bed at night, and I'd be in tears."

Homes stood empty, businesses were boarded up, and parts of already-blighted Birmingham began to take on the feel of a ghost town. There were also a few bills that were unique to the area — like the $64 sewer bill that Pack and her family paid each month. "Yeah, it went up about 400 percent just over the past few years," she says.

The sewer bill, in fact, is what cost Pack and her co-workers their jobs. In 1996, the average monthly sewer bill for a family of four in Birmingham was only $14.71 — but that was before the county decided to build an elaborate new sewer system with the help of out-of-state financial wizards with names like Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase. The result was a monstrous pile of borrowed money that the county used to build, in essence, the world's grandest toilet — "the Taj Mahal of sewer-treatment plants" is how one county worker put it. What happened here in Jefferson County would turn out to be the perfect metaphor for the peculiar alchemy of modern oligarchical capitalism: A mob of corrupt local officials and morally absent financiers got together to build a giant device that converted human shit into billions of dollars of profit for Wall Street — and misery for people like Lisa Pack.

And once the giant shit machine was built and the note on all that fancy construction started to come due, Wall Street came back to the local politicians and doubled down on the scam. They showed up in droves to help the poor, broke citizens of Jefferson County cut their toilet finance charges using a blizzard of incomprehensible swaps and refinance schemes — schemes that only served to postpone the repayment date a year or two while sinking the county deeper into debt. In the end, every time Jefferson County so much as breathed near one of the banks, it got charged millions in fees. There was so much money to be made bilking these dizzy Southerners that banks like JP Morgan spent millions paying middlemen who bribed — yes, that's right, bribed, criminally bribed — the county commissioners and their buddies just to keep their business. Hell, the money was so good, JP Morgan at one point even paid Goldman Sachs $3 million just to back the fuck off, so they could have the rubes of Jefferson County to fleece all for themselves.

Birmingham became the poster child for a new kind of giant-scale financial fraud, one that would threaten the financial stability not only of cities and counties all across America, but even those of entire countries like Greece. While for many Americans the financial crisis remains an abstraction, a confusing mess of complex transactions that took place on a cloud high above Manhattan sometime in the mid-2000s, in Jefferson County you can actually see the rank criminality of the crisis economy with your own eyes; the monster sticks his head all the way out of the water. Here you can see a trail that leads directly from a billion-dollar predatory swap deal cooked up at the highest levels of America's biggest banks, across a vast fruited plain of bribes and felonies — "the price of doing business," as one JP Morgan banker says on tape — all the way down to Lisa Pack's sewer bill and the mass layoffs in Birmingham.

Once you follow that trail and understand what took place in Jefferson County, there's really no room left for illusions. We live in a gangster state, and our days of laughing at other countries are over. It's our turn to get laughed at. In Birmingham, lots of people have gone to jail for the crime: More than 20 local officials and businessmen have been convicted of corruption in federal court. Last October, right around the time that Lisa Pack went back to work at reduced hours, Birmingham's mayor was convicted of fraud and money-laundering for taking bribes funneled to him by Wall Street bankers — everything from Rolex watches to Ferragamo suits to cash. But those who greenlighted the bribes and profited most from the scam remain largely untouched. "It never gets back to JP Morgan," says Pack.

If you want to get all Glenn Beck about it, you could lay the blame for this entire mess at the feet of weepy, tree-hugging environmentalists. It all started with the Cahaba River, the longest free-flowing river in the state of Alabama. The tributary, which winds its way through Birmingham before turning diagonally to empty out near Selma, is home to more types of fish per mile than any other river in America and shelters 64 rare and imperiled species of plants and animals. It's also the source of one of the worst municipal financial disasters in American history.

Back in the early 1990s, the county's sewer system was so antiquated that it was leaking raw sewage directly into the Cahaba, which also supplies the area with its drinking water. Joined by well — intentioned citizens from the Cahaba River Society, the EPA sued the county to force it to comply with the Clean Water Act. In 1996, county commissioners signed a now-infamous consent decree agreeing not just to fix the leaky pipes but to eliminate allsewer overflows — a near-impossible standard that required the county to build the most elaborate, ecofriendly, expensive sewer system in the history of the universe. It was like ordering a small town in Florida that gets a snowstorm once every five years to build a billion-dollar fleet of snowplows.

The original cost estimates for the new sewer system were as low as $250 million. But in a wondrous demonstration of the possibilities of small-town graft and contract-padding, the price tag quickly swelled to more than $3 billion. County commissioners were literally pocketing wads of cash from builders and engineers and other contractors eager to get in on the project, while the county was forced to borrow obscene sums to pay for the rapidly spiraling costs. Jefferson County, in effect, became one giant, TV-stealing, unemployed drug addict who borrowed a million dollars to buy the mother of all McMansions — and just as it did during the housing bubble, Wall Street made a business of keeping the crook in his house. As one county commissioner put it, "We're like a guy making $50,000 a year with a million-dollar mortgage."

To reassure lenders that the county would pay its mortgage, commissioners gave the finance director — an unelected official appointed by the president of the commission — the power to automatically raise sewer rates to meet payments on the debt. The move brought in billions in financing, but it also painted commissioners into a corner. If costs continued to rise — and with practically every contractor in Alabama sticking his fingers on the scale, they were rising fast — officials would be faced with automatic rate increases that would piss off their voters. (By 2003, annual interest on the sewer deal had reached $90 million.) So the commission reached out to Wall Street, looking for creative financing tools that would allow it to reduce the county's staggering debt payments.

Wall Street was happy to help. First, it employed the same trick it used to fuel the housing crisis: It switched the county from a fixed rate on the bonds it had issued to finance the sewer deal to an adjustable rate. The refinancing meant lower interest payments for a couple of years — followed by the risk of even larger payments down the road. The move enabled county commissioners to postpone the problem for an election season or two, kicking it to a group of future commissioners who would inevitably have to pay the real freight.

But then Wall Street got really creative. Having switched the county to a variable interest rate, it offered commissioners a crazy deal: For an extra fee, the banks said, we'll allow you to keep paying a fixed rate on your debt to us. In return, we'll give you a variable amount each month that you can use to pay off all that variable-rate interest you owe to bondholders.

In financial terms, this is known as a synthetic rate swap — the spidery creature you might have read about playing a role in bringing down places like Greece and Milan. On paper, it made sense: The county got the stability of a fixed rate, while paying Wall Street to assume the risk of the variable rates on its bonds. That's the synthetic part. The trouble lies in the rate swap. The deal only works if the two variable rates — the one you get from the bank, and the one you owe to bondholders — actually match. It's like gambling on the weather. If your bondholders are expecting you to pay an interest rate based on the average temperature in Alabama, you don't do a rate swap with a bank that gives you back a rate pegged to the temperature in Nome, Alaska.

Not unless you're a fucking moron. Or your banker is JP Morgan.

In a small office in a federal building in downtown Birmingham, just blocks from where civil rights demonstrators shut down the city in 1963, Assistant U.S. Attorney George Martin points out the window. He's pointing in the direction of the Tutwiler Hotel, once home to one of the grandest ballrooms in the South but now part of the Hampton Inn chain.

"It was right around the corner here, at the hotel," Martin says. "That's where they met — that's where this all started."

They means Charles LeCroy and Bill Blount, the two principals in what would become the most important of all the corruption cases in Jefferson County. LeCroy was a banker for JP Morgan, serving as managing director of the bank's southeast regional office. Blount was an Alabama wheeler-dealer with close friends on the county commission. For years, when Wall Street banks wanted to do business with municipalities, whether for bond issues or rate swaps, it was standard practice to reach out to a local sleazeball like Blount and pay him a shitload of money to help seal the deal. "Banks would pay some local consultant, and the consultant would then funnel money to the politician making the decision," says Christopher Taylor, the former head of the board that regulates municipal borrowing. Back in the 1990s, Taylor pushed through a ban on such backdoor bribery. He also passed a ban on bankers contributing directly to politicians they do business with — a move that sparked a lawsuit by one aggrieved sleazeball, who argued that halting such legalized graft violated his First Amendment rights. The name of that pissed-off banker? "It was the one and only Bill Blount," Taylor says with a laugh.

Blount is a stocky, stubby-fingered Southerner with glasses and a pale, pinched face — if Norman Rockwell had ever done a painting titled "Small-Town Accountant Taking Enormous Dump," it would look just like Blount. LeCroy, his sugar daddy at JP Morgan, is a tall, bloodless, crisply dressed corporate operator with a shiny bald head and silver side patches — a cross between Skeletor and Michael Stipe.

The scheme they operated went something like this: LeCroy paid Blount millions of dollars, and Blount turned around and used the money to buy lavish gifts for his close friend Larry Langford, the now-convicted Birmingham mayor who at the time had just been elected president of the county commission. (At one point Blount took Langford on a shopping spree in New York, putting $3,290 worth of clothes from Zegna on his credit card.) Langford then signed off on one after another of the deadly swap deals being pushed by LeCroy. Every time the county refinanced its sewer debt, JP Morgan made millions of dollars in fees. Even more lucrative, each of the swap contracts contained clauses that mandated all sorts of penalties and payments in the event that something went wrong with the deal. In the mortgage business, this process is known as churning: You keep coming back over and over to refinance, and they keep "churning" you for more and more fees. "The transactions were complex, but the scheme was simple," said Robert Khuzami, director of enforcement for the SEC. "Senior JP Morgan bankers made unlawful payments to win business and earn fees."

Given the shitload of money to be made on the refinancing deals, JP Morgan was prepared to pay whatever it took to buy off officials in Jefferson County. In 2002, during a conversation recorded in Nixonian fashion by JP Morgan itself, LeCroy bragged that he had agreed to funnel payoff money to a pair of local companies to secure the votes of two county commissioners. "Look," the commissioners told him, "if we support the synthetic refunding, you guys have to take care of our two firms." LeCroy didn't blink. "Whatever you want," he told them. "If that's what you need, that's what you get. Just tell us how much."

Just tell us how much. That sums up the approach that JP Morgan took a few months later, when Langford announced that his good buddy Bill Blount would henceforth be involved with every financing transaction for Jefferson County. From JP Morgan's point of view, the decision to pay off Blount was a no-brainer. But the bank had one small problem: Goldman Sachs had already crawled up Blount's trouser leg, and the broker was advising Langford to pick them as Jefferson County's investment bank.

The solution they came up with was an extraordinary one: JP Morgan cut a separate deal with Goldman, paying the bank $3 million to fuck off, with Blount taking a $300,000 cut of the side deal. Suddenly Goldman was out and JP Morgan was sitting in Langford's lap. In another conversation caught on tape, LeCroy joked that the deal was his "philanthropic work," since the payoff amounted to a "charitable donation to Goldman Sachs" in return for "taking no risk."

That such a blatant violation of anti-trust laws took place and neither JP Morgan nor Goldman have been prosecuted for it is yet another mystery of the current financial crisis. "This is an open-and-shut case of anti-competitive behavior," says Taylor, the former regulator.

With Goldman out of the way, JP Morgan won the right to do a $1.1 billion bond offering — switching Jefferson County out of fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt — and also did a corresponding $1.1 billion deal for a synthetic rate swap. The very same day the transaction was concluded, in May 2003, LeCroy had dinner with Langford and struck a deal to do yet another bond-and-swap transaction of roughly the same size. This time, the terms of the payoff were spelled out more explicitly. In a hilarious phone call between LeCroy and Douglas MacFaddin, another JP Morgan official, the two bankers groaned aloud about how much it was going to cost to satisfy Blount.

LeCroy: I said, "Commissioner Langford, I'll do that because that's your suggestion, but you gotta help us keep him under control. Because when you give that guy a hand, he takes your arm." You know?

MacFaddin: [Laughing] Yeah, you end up in the wood-chipper.

All told, JP Morgan ended up paying Blount nearly $3 million for "performing no known services," in the words of the SEC. In at least one of the deals, Blount made upward of 15 percent of JP Morgan's entire fee. When I ask Taylor what a legitimate consultant might earn in such a circumstance, he laughs. "What's a 'legitimate consultant' in a case like this? He made this money for doing jack shit."

As the tapes of LeCroy's calls show, even officials at JP Morgan were incredulous at the money being funneled to Blount. "How does he get 15 percent?" one associate at the bank asks LeCroy. "For doing what? For not messing with us?"

"Not messing with us," LeCroy agrees. "It's a lot of money, but in the end, it's worth it on a billion-dollar deal."

That's putting it mildly: The deals wound up being the largest swap agreements in JP Morgan's history. Making matters worse, the payoffs didn't even wind up costing the bank a dime. As the SEC explained in a statement on the scam, JP Morgan "passed on the cost of the unlawful payments by charging the county higher interest rates on the swap transactions." In other words, not only did the bank bribe local politicians to take the sucky deal, they got local taxpayers to pay for the bribes. And because Jefferson County had no idea what kind of deal it was getting on the swaps, JP Morgan could basically charge whatever it wanted. According to an analysis of the swap deals commissioned by the county in 2007, taxpayers had been overcharged at least $93 million on the transactions.

JP Morgan was far from alone in the scam: Virtually everyone doing business in Jefferson County was on the take. Four of the nation's top investment banks, the very cream of American finance, were involved in one way or another with payoffs to Blount in their scramble to do business with the county. In addition to JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns paid Langford's bagman $2.4 million, while Lehman Brothers got off cheap with a $35,000 "arranger's fee." At least a dozen of the county's contractors were also cashing in, along with many of the county commissioners. "If you go into the county courthouse," says Michael Morrison, a planner who works for the county, "there's a gallery of past commissioners on the wall. On the top row, every single one of 'em but two has been investigated, indicted or convicted. It's a joke."

The crazy thing is that such arrangements — where some local scoundrel gets a massive fee for doing nothing but greasing the wheels with elected officials — have been taking place all over the country. In Illinois, during the Upper Volta-esque era of Rod Blagojevich, a Republican political consultant named Robert Kjellander got 10 percent of the entire fee Bear Stearns earned doing a bond sale for the state pension fund. At the start of Obama's term, Bill Richardson's Cabinet appointment was derailed for a similar scheme when he was governor of New Mexico. Indeed, one reason that officials in Jefferson County didn't know that the swaps they were signing off on were shitty was because their adviser on the deals was a firm called CDR Financial Products, which is now accused of conspiring to overcharge dozens of cities in swap transactions. According to a federal antitrust lawsuit, CDR is basically a big-league version of Bill Blount — banks tossed money at the firm, which in turn advised local politicians that they were getting a good deal. "It was basically, you pay CDR, and CDR helps push the deal through," says Taylor.

In the end, though, all this bribery and graft was just the table-setter for the real disaster. In taking all those bribes and signing on to all those swaps, the commissioners in Jefferson County had basically started the clock on a financial time bomb that, sooner or later, had to explode. By continually refinancing to keep the county in its giant McMansion, the commission had managed to push into the future that inevitable day when the real bill would arrive in the mail. But that's where the mortgage analogy ends — because in one key area, a swap deal differs from a home mortgage. Imagine a mortgage that you have to keep on paying even after you sell your house. That's basically how a swap deal works. And Jefferson County had done 23 of them. At one point, they had more outstanding swaps than New York City.

Judgment Day was coming — just like it was for the Delaware River Port Authority, the Pennsylvania school system, the cities of Detroit, Chicago, Oakland and Los Angeles, the states of Connecticut and Mississippi, the city of Milan and nearly 500 other municipalities in Italy, the country of Greece, and God knows who else. All of these places are now reeling under the weight of similarly elaborate and ill-advised swaps — and if what happened in Jefferson County is any guide, hoo boy. Because when the shit hit the fan in Birmingham, it really hit the fan.

For Jefferson County, the deal blew up in early 2008, when a dizzying array of penalties and other fine-print poison worked into the swap contracts started to kick in. The trouble began with the housing crash, which took down the insurance companies that had underwritten the county's bonds. That rendered the county's insurance worthless, triggering clauses in its swap contracts that required it to pay off more than $800 million of its debt in only four years, rather than 40. That, in turn, scared off private lenders, who were no longer interested in bidding on the county's bonds. The banks were forced to make up the difference — a service for which they charged enormous penalties. It was as if the county had missed a payment on its credit card and woke up the next morning to find its annual percentage rate jacked up to a million percent. Between 2008 and 2009, the annual payment on Jefferson County's debt jumped from $53 million to a whopping $636 million.

It gets worse. Remember the swap deal that Jefferson County did with JP Morgan, how the variable rates it got from the bank were supposed to match those it owed its bondholders? Well, they didn't. Most of the payments the county was receiving from JP Morgan were based on one set of interest rates (the London Interbank Exchange Rate), while the payments it owed to its bondholders followed a different set of rates (a municipal-bond index). Jefferson County was suddenly getting far less from JP Morgan, and owing tons more to bondholders. In other words, the bank and Bill Blount made tens of millions of dollars selling deals to local politicians that were not only completely defective, but blew the entire county to smithereens.

And here's the kicker. Last year, when Jefferson County, staggered by the weight of its penalties, was unable to make its swap payments to JP Morgan, the bank canceled the deal. That triggered one-time "termination fees" of — yes, you read this right — $647 million. That was money the county would owe no matter what happened with the rest of its debt, even if bondholders decided to forgive and forget every dime the county had borrowed. It was like the herpes simplex of loans — debt that does not go away, ever, for as long as you live. On a sewer project that was originally supposed to cost $250 million, the county now owed a total of $1.28 billion just in interest and fees on the debt. Imagine paying $250,000 a year on a car you purchased for $50,000, and that's roughly where Jefferson County stood at the end of last year.

Last November, the SEC charged JP Morgan with fraud and canceled the $647 million in termination fees. The bank agreed to pay a $25 million fine and fork over $50 million to assist displaced workers in Jefferson County. So far, the county has managed to avoid bankruptcy, but the sewer fiasco had downgraded its credit rating, triggering payments on other outstanding loans and pushing Birmingham toward the status of an African debtor state. For the next generation, the county will be in a constant fight to collect enough taxes just to pay off its debt, which now totals $4,800 per resident.

The city of Birmingham was founded in 1871, at the dawn of the Southern industrial boom, for the express purpose of attracting Northern capital — it was even named after a famous British steel town to burnish its entrepreneurial cred. There's a gruesome irony in it now lying sacked and looted by financial vandals from the North. The destruction of Jefferson County reveals the basic battle plan of these modern barbarians, the way that banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs have systematically set out to pillage towns and cities from Pittsburgh to Athens. These guys aren't number-crunching whizzes making smart investments; what they do is find suckers in some municipal-finance department, corner them in complex lose-lose deals and flay them alive. In a complete subversion of free-market principles, they take no risk, score deals based on political influence rather than competition, keep consumers in the dark — and walk away with big money. "It's not high finance," says Taylor, the former bond regulator. "It's low finance." And even if the regulators manage to catch up with them billions of dollars later, the banks just pay a small fine and move on to the next scam. This isn't capitalism. It's nomadic thievery.

[From Issue 1102 — April 15, 2010]

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

China's Tencent to Buy Stake in Russia's DST

BEIJING—China's largest Internet company, Tencent Holdings Ltd., is purchasing a 10% stake in Digital Sky Technologies Ltd., a Russian investment firm that holds a stake in Facebook Inc.

Shenzhen-based Tencent, which popularized instant messaging in China and operates an online game portal and other Chinese Internet services, said it will invest approximately $300 million in Moscow-based Digital Sky, also known as DST. The companies plan to explore "new business opportunities" in the Russian-speaking Internet markets, said Tencent President Martin Lau in a joint statement Monday.

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Monday, April 5, 2010

Personal Bankruptcies Skyrocket in March

This statistic is mind boggling! Federal courts reported 158,000 bankruptcy filings in March. That amounts to 6,900 per day and a rise of 35% from February, as stated by Aacer, a court electronic records data collection agency.

The reason for this jump is obvious. Unemployment is rising to nearly 17% for all categories labeled by the U.S. Labor Department. Katherine M. Porter of the University of Iowa said: "Fewer people are trying to save their homes. ... They realize their payments are not affordable and bankruptcy judges do not have the power to adjust the mortgages to make them more affordable."

The greatest rise in bankruptcy filings are under Chapter 7, which is easier than Chapter 13. With Chapter 13, you need ongoing income and are able to reorganize your debts. Of the 158,141 bankruptcy filings in March, some 75%, or 118,505, were under Chapter 7. Chapter 7 filings have increased about 73% in 2009.

Professor Porter went on to say, "We think that means fewer families think they're really going to save their homes. ... They don't have any equity, so why try to keep up with their home payments?"

"People use their tax refunds to pay their attorney fees," she said.

The contrast of stories like this against the backdrop of Wall Street's ongoing rally makes one wonder: where do fantasy and reality come together?

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Sent via Readability: 20 Recommended Bookmarklets For Your Web Browser


From: readability@arc90.com
To: gopu@live.in
Subject: Sent via Readability: 20 Recommended Bookmarklets For Your Web Browser
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 03:38:33 +0000

This page was sent to you by: vkgopu@gmail.com
Just click this link: 20 Recommended Bookmarklets For Your Web Browser

Sent from Readability | An Arc90 lab experiment


Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Friday, April 2, 2010

Chance Davos meeting leads to 2012 Olympic tower

A chance meeting in a coatroom at the World Economic Forum has led to plans for Britain's largest sculpture to be built next to the Olympic Stadium in an effort to attract visitors after the 2012 London Games.

London Mayor Boris Johnson had what he described as a 45-second conversation with Lakshmi Mittal in which he pressed the steel magnate to provide the materials for the construction of a huge tower.

Mittal agreed to provide the steel as part of a $24 million contribution to the $29 million project. The ArcelorMittal Orbit, as the new structure will be known, was presented Wednesday as resembling an upturned trombone surrounded by twisting walkways.

The 377-foot structure will stand between the Olympic Stadium and Aquatic Center.

"After 18 months of construction on the site, we knew we didn't have any cash but we would need a prodigious quantity of steel," Johnson said. "I was wracking my brains to think of anyone I knew who had large quantities of steel.

"In Davos, in the cloakroom, who should I bump into but Lakshmi Mittal. We'd never been introduced before. It wasn't a 60-second conversation, it was a 45-second conversation. I framed the idea, which took about 40 seconds and he immediately, immediately said 'I'll give you the steel.'"

Mittal, rated the world's fifth richest man by Forbes with an estimated wealth of $28.7 billion, said he had a slightly different recollection of the meeting.

"He spoke for the full 45 seconds," Mittal said of the garrulous mayor. "I didn't have a chance to say yes or no.

"I was fascinated to know more, especially when he said he wanted it to be built out of steel. I live in London and I think it is a wonderful city."

The structure will be more than twice the height of London's iconic Nelson's Column and 72 feet taller than the Statue of Liberty. Visitors will be able to ascend the structure via two elevators or the walkway to view the Olympic Park and central London, 7.8 miles to the west.

"We decided we needed to give that site something extra, something to distinguish the east London skyline and something to arouse the curiosity of Londoners and visitors alike," Johnson said. "Our ambition was to turn the Stratford site into a destination, a must-see item on the tourist itinerary."

The tower features a viewing platform and restaurant near the top. The mayor's London Development Agency expects to recoup its $4.7 million contribution by renting the space to corporate sponsors -- although International Olympic Committee rules will restrict its use during the games.

London-based artist Anish Kapoor, a previous winner of the prestigious Turner Prize, and partner Cecil Balmond won a competition to design the tower that will be dominated by a looping lattice of tubular steel.

Kapoor is known for large-scale installations like "Marsyas" -- a giant blood-red PVC membrane that was displayed at London's Tate Modern in 2002 -- and "The Bean," a stainless steel sculpture in Chicago's Millennium Park.

The structure should be completed by mid-2011 and the restaurant finished by November that year.

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

India to overtake China in growth by 2018: EIU

The Times of India: March 17, 2010

 

New Delhi: India will overtake China to become world's fastest growing economy by 2018, said the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), the research arm of London-based Economist magazine. Because of the favourable demography — higher percentage of working population — India's growth rate will continue to remain on the higher side, said Anjalika Bardalai, senior analyst at EIU. At present, China is the fastest growing economy in the world.

Bardalai said considering strong fundamentals, "our long range forecast suggests that India will sustain an average annual growth rate of 6.4% to 2030." India will take the lead not because of its growth rate is likely to attain double-digit level but China's growth rate will moderate with development of its economy, she added.

However, for the current financial year, Bardalai said Indian economy would grow at 6.8% only. But, this is not comparable with figure of 7.2% projected by the government as EIU has adopted a different methodology to calculate the rate. "Our projection is based on expenditure in economy and is not on factor cost as done by the Indian government," she explained. She said the growth rate will pick up to 7.7% in 2010-11 and 8% in 2011-12. "Continued domestic consumption, spurred by rising income and a growing middle class, will be primary drivers behind India's growth. At the same time, high savings and investments will help India achieve the higher growth rate."

According to EIU, inflow of investments through foreign institutional investors (FIIs) will touch $75 billion by 2014, which is currently hovering at around $36 billion. EIU felt that the biggest hurdle to achieve higher growth is the high inflation and infrastructural bottleneck. As the inflation has already risen close to 10% in February, the monetary pressure is likely to increase

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

TEST

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Have you locked your keys in the car? Does you car have remote keys?:

If you lock your keys in the car and the spare keys are at home, call someone at home on their cell phone from your cell phone. Hold your cell phone about a foot from your car door and have the person at your home press the unlock button, holding it near the mobile phone on their end. Your car will unlock.

Saves someone from having to drive your keys to you. Distance is no object. You could be hundreds of miles away, and if you can reach someone who has the other "remote" for your car, you can unlock the doors (or the trunk).

Posted via email from gopu's posterous

Sunday, March 7, 2010

The New Colours Of Venture Capital

The sun sets and a shroud of darkness descends rapidly over Bihar’s West Champaran district. Without electricity, much of the population turns to kerosene lanterns. But Tamkuha and 45 other villages in the district are glimmering islands of light, even late into the night. A little company called Husk Power Systems (HPS) has been setting up mini power plants in these villages. As its name suggests, the plants are powered by rice husk—512 kg of it in a day. Each plant costs under Rs 15 lakh, employs 3-4 people and generates about 32 kilowatts of electricity—enough to power about 500 households and shops, or about three villages.

The first such plant came up in Tamkuha. “We chose the worst possible place to start business. Tamkuha was a hotbed of bad things,” recalls Gyanesh Pandey, CEO of HPS. It was infamous for being the ‘university of kidnapping’. If Pandey could prove his business model here, he figured he could do it anywhere.

Electricity started flowing out of the husk plant in Tamkuha in 2008. And it brought light into the life of 14-year-old Haresh Kumar Yadav. Till he was 11, Yadav had to work the fields in the evenings to pay his school fees. He would sit hunched up over a kerosene lantern to catch up with his studies after sunset. But now, he is doubly blessed. “I can study late into the night and the power plant pays my school fees of Rs 50 a month,” says a delighted Yadav. HPS pays the fees of 200 students in Tamkuha as part of its corporate social responsibility initiative.

The cost of electricity is Rs 40 for 15 watts of electricity, enough to light one bulb for one month. Some can draw more depending on their propensity to spend. About 200 watts of power is enough to run a TV, fan and light in one household for a month. “Electricity has given us a new lease of life,” says Mohammad Imtiaz Alam, a Tamkuha resident and the engine operator at HPS’s plant.


Rice Power: Husk Power Systems, backed by investor Oasis, builds mini-power plants. It has lit up children’s lives in Gorakhpur, UP and also pays their school fees.

The company has also electrified 20 villages in other parts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. In the next three years, it wants to electrify 5,000 villages in 10 states.

If HPS can dream about electrifying large swathes of rural India, it is only because it has itself been powered up by a $2 million investment by two social venture capital funds—the $30 million, Switzerland-based Oasis Fund and the $40 million, Hyderabad-based Acumen Fund. Others like Cisco and Draper Fisher Jurvetson are also investors.

New Breed

Oasis and Acumen are part of a new, growing breed of ‘social venture capital funds’. These funds look to invest in companies that deliver social benefits and generate decent financial returns. They embody the new mantra: doing well while doing good. “Social capital is an emerging trend both globally and in India,” says Varun Sahni, Country Director, Acumen Fund. It plans to invest $100 million over the next six years.

“There will be $1 billion coming into this space in the next five years,” Sahni forecasts. Monitor India, a management consulting firm, conducted a two-year study on identifying eight low-cost business opportunities. It further narrowed this down to four: water, healthcare, education and affordable housing. “In each of these we went and talked to 2-3 entrepreneurs running the more successful enterprises. They were all good candidates and people had invested in them. So, there is a lot of interest in this space,” says Anamitra Deb, consultant, Monitor Group. “But a lot more needs to be done before this becomes a flourishing investment market.”

Many of these social investments have one thing in common—the venture capitalists backing them have pushed the entrepreneurs to go after growth and scale. Not just for better returns, but also to widen the social benefit.

Already, seven such social venture capital funds, interviewed for this story have raised around $180 million and invested about $125 million in 72 social enterprises. All this has happened in the last six years (mainstream VCs invested a total of $3.31 billion in the same period, according to Venture Intelligence, a research service tracking private equity and M&A activity in India). Each of these funds has its own comfort zone in the social-benefit versus financial-return balance.

On the one hand, there are funds like Acumen, which raises philanthropic capital to invest in sustainable enterprises that provide affordable products and services to the poor. For Acumen, social impact, not financial returns, is the primary consideration.

Another example is the $12 million not-for-profit Gray Matters Capital, which invests in companies that bridge the digital gap between the country’s rural and urban markets. “Applying market principles to guarantee responsible use of money is the biggest realisation of philanthropic institutions today,” says Arun Gore, Managing Director and Principal of Gray Ghost Ventures. “Social entrepreneurs are passionate about helping people, so the commercial returns aspect is usually a secondary concern,” says Deb.

On the other hand, there is the $189.4 million NEA-Indo US Venture Partners, run by Vinod Dham, Vani Kola and Kumar Shiralagi. It will invest only in profitable ventures that promise good returns. Social good is incidental. The philosophy of these investors is clear: they want to make money by serving the needs of people at the bottom of the pyramid.


Acumen Fund

  • Fund size $40 million (approx)
  • Fund manager Varun Sahni
  • Investment philosophy and focus To support sustainable enterprises providing the poor with critical goods and services at an affordable price. Primary focus on healthcare, housing, water, energy and agriculture
  • Companies invested in 12
  • Fund-raising strategy Gets philanthropic donations from individuals, institutions and foundations locally and abroad
  • Social good Vs financial profit Social impact is crucial for all investments

Varun Sahni, Country Director, Acumen Fund Vikas Shah, CEO, Water Health International, India

“There is an ecosystem being built for social impact with some returns.”


Some, like Aavishkaar Fund, which raises money mostly from commercial sources, fit in the middle. It manages around Rs 200 crore now (for investments in social enterprise and microfinance) and plans on taking this to about Rs 1,000 crore in the next four years. “We are hard-core commercial capital, not grants looking like equity,” says Vineet Rai, Founder, Aavishkaar Fund. He doesn’t like to be labelled a ‘social investor’ as his fund invests in ‘emerging economy’ companies. Rai’s objective is to make money, but Aavishkaar will not do a deal with an entrepreneur who focuses only on profit maximisation. “We make a judgment on the soul of the guy instead of depending on excel sheets alone,” he says. Aavishkaar’s philosophy is to create wealth in order to distribute it.

Some are driven by a passion for development. Others see development as just another business opportunity. And still others want the best of both worlds. But whatever the colour of their money, venture capital funds are beginning to swoop in to fund social enterprises.

Still Nascent

Social venture capital is only a three-year-old experiment in India, though it has been around for many years overseas (see interview with Antony Bugg-Levine, Managing Director, Rockefeller Foundation on page 56). It is still an experiment, because investors are testing out the fundamental thesis that their money can be used for social development and earn decent financial returns. There are many success stories among the 72 such investments that Outlook Business surveyed for this story. Rangsutra, a garment, accessories and home furnishings company is one striking example. It creates employment and business opportunities for desert artisans in Rajasthan’s Churu, Bikaner and Jaisalmer districts.


Power Duo: Gradatim CEO Prakash CV (left) and Indo US Ventures Managing Director Kumar Shiralagi.

Rangsutra’s shareholders comprise a unique mix of three constituents. There is Sumita Ghose founder, Managing Director and a social entrepreneur—she holds 50% of the company’s equity along with a microfinance institution that works with artisans. There is Aavishkaar Fund, which bought 23% of Rangsutra’s equity for Rs 25-30 lakh in 2007. And then, there are 1,070 artisans, who own the remaining 27%—they pooled in money and bought the stake for Rs 10 lakh, at Rs 100 per share. “We wanted to ensure that rural artisans get work round the year and become shareholders as this gets them more involved,” states Ghose. The artisans make the garments and furnishings. Rangsutra supplies these to Fab India outlets across the country. This is a high-volume, low-margin (15-20%) business. But exports, primarily to Europe, rake in 50% margins, though the volumes are low.

Social entrepreneur-venture capitalist-community—the combine that drives Rangsutra—is a microcosm of a larger, similar ecosystem that is slowly evolving.

Rangsutra keeps all three constituents happy. The community is happy. Mathiri Bai, a 23-year-old artisan in Dandkala village, 250 km from Bikaner, has found a steady source of income in Rangsutra. Bai was working as a construction labourer three years ago. “It was like slavery, and I made Rs 3- 5 a day,” she reflects. Now, she earns Rs 4,000 a month—typical wages of a home-based artisan who doesn’t work more than 4-5 hours a day. Rangsutra recently got her to meet designer Ritu Suri, whom Bai gave a sample of her embroidery work. “I almost went to South Africa for an exhibition but couldn’t get a visa in time,” boasts Bai. “I have forgotten my old life now.”


VenturEast

  • Fund size $250 million
  • Fund manager Sarath Naru
  • Investment philosophy and focus To build profitable businesses that cater to under-served markets. Focuses on meeting India’s domestic needs (primarily rural and semi-urban markets) by backing early-stage / rapid-growth businesses
  • Companies invested in Over 50 (including 25 social enterprises)
  • Fund-raising strategy Raising capital from institutional investors—Indian commercial banks, insurance companies, foreign developmental financial institutions, foreign family offices—that are commercial returns-oriented
  • Social good Vs financial profit Purely returns oriented. The social good is a by-product of the investment strategy

Sarath Naru, Managing Partner, VenturEast; Sameer Sawarkar, CEO, Neurosynaptics

“One can make money via companies focused on the bottom of the pyramid.”


The social entrepreneur is happy. Ghose has seen her company grow from Rs 1.5 crore in FY08 to Rs 4 crore in FY09. “They are reasonably profitable and paid 10% dividend last year,” says Aavishkaar’s Rai. Now Ghose has plans to expand her business in East India.

The investor is happy too. Rai is hoping Rangsutra will become a Rs 100 crore company in the next five years. That will facilitate one of his exit options: a stake sale to Fab India. “Otherwise, if it is still a Rs 10 crore company, we will sell our holding back to the promoters,” he says. Aavishkaar is a commercial fund in every sense and has to earn profits for the investors, who have put money into its Rs 60 crore micro-venture fund.

Health Is Wealth

Rangsutra is not a stray success. If a social enterprise is able to meet a clear developmental need, it is highly likely that it can be turned into a profitable and sustainable business. And, of course, a little help from socially inclined venture capitalists is welcome. If Husk Power Systems built a sustainable business around power, and Rangsutra around artisan livelihoods, the Indian arm of Water Health International (WHI) did the same with water. It too had a godfather investor in Acumen, which picked up a 10% stake in 2005 for an undisclosed sum.

WHI’s story is an interesting one. Early this decade, Dr Ashok Gadgil, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, patented an ultra-violet waterworks (UVW) treatment to kill pathogens and other microbiological contaminants in water. This treatment is three times more powerful than the UVW technology available in the market today. WHI, which was initially set up in the US, bought the patent from Gadgil. The company’s India outfit was set up in 2006.


Oasis Fund

  • Fund size $30 million (still raising)
  • Fund manager Bamboo Finance
  • Investment philosophy and focus To support enterprises that develop innovative solutions that provide the poor with better access to critical goods and services. Invests mostly equity, with some debt. Investments generally range between $1 million to $6 million
  • Companies invested in 4
  • Fund-raising strategy Targeting high-net-worth individuals and institutional investors
  • Social good Vs financial profit Aims to have a significant social impact while earning attractive financial returns

Eric Berkowitz, Chief Investment Officer, Bamboo Finance

“We have a significant portfolio here with $7 million already invested. India is a very important country for us.”


WHI wanted to build a business around community water systems. It began building water purification plants in villages with a perennial source of water and electricity. Villagers could walk into the plant and buy water at a minimum price.

Philanthropically inclined high-net-worth individuals, and sometimes, villagers, pool in to buy the water systems. By setting up a plant in the middle of a village, packaging, distribution and logistics costs are eliminated. “We eliminate around 60-70% of the cost of branded retail water,” says Vikas Shah, CEO, WHI. Villagers can pay a minimum 15 paise per litre for purified drinking water (a regular bottle of mineral water costs Rs 14.) “The biggest challenge was to be low-cost and high-quality,” he adds.

The other challenge was to convince villagers of the need for purified water. His social marketing team works with women’s Self Help Groups and children in local schools. “We take a microscope and show them the pathogens crawling in the water. This draws a strong reaction,” says Shah. Parvathi Ponasanapalli, a 60-year-old widow from the village of Padampudi, 450 Km from Hyderabad, is a regular customer. She has been buying water for the past two years. “I spend Rs 2 for 12 litres every day,” she says.

Today, Shah has over 300 such community water plants in four regions of the country: Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Each plant costs between Rs 8-12 lakh. WHI purifies 21,000 litres per day at its smallest plant and 1.3 lakh litres per day at its largest. On average, the company purifies 40-50 million litres of water every month. Shah plans on doubling his current capacity and extending his footprint to other states this year. Each plant can break even by running at 30-40% capacity. Acumen’s Sahni seems happy with this investment: “If you outprice your product with profit maximisation as the goal, the consumer’s cost will be high and scalability becomes an issue.”

Guiding Them Along

The success of Rangsutra-Aavishkaar and WHI-Acumen is not a flash in the pan. “A lot of our companies become successful in a short span of time,” boasts Rai, pointing to Vatsalya, a company setting up rural hospitals, and Vortex, a rural ATM company. Aavishkaar plays a key role in shaping the business models of its portfolio companies—its staff of 14 work closely with the latter. It has a board seat in Rangsutra and helped the management streamline the business, think strategically, and go after growth. “They really helped us work through our business plan, especially on costing and cash-flow issues,” says a grateful Ghose. If Rangsutra does grow to Rs 100 crore in revenues, a lot of the credit will go to Rai. As an investor, it was he, perhaps even more than the entrepreneur Ghose, who first believed Rangsutra could scale up.


Song

  • Fund size $17 million
  • Fund managers Vishal Vasishth and Kartik Srivatsa
  • Investment philosophy and focus To support entrepreneurs in high-growth sectors like education and training, agriculture and food, healthcare, financial services, basic utilities (waste, water, rural telecom, affordable housing, etc) that are aligned with inclusive growth
  • Companies invested in None yet
  • Fund-raising strategy Set up by Soros Economic Development Fund, Omidyar Network and Google
  • Social good Vs financial profit Focuses on sectors and opportunities where both financial and social returns can be generated simultaneously

Vishal Vasishth, Founder & Managing Director, Song

“We see ourselves as partners with entrepreneurs, rather than as financiers.”


Across many such investments, it is the venture capitalists who are driving social entrepreneurs to go after scale and growth. The quest for scale is not just to improve financial returns, but for much more—the greater the scale of a social enterprise, the greater the social benefit.

Neurosynaptics, a telemedicine technology and service provider, is a good example. It provides devices and software for video and audio conferencing needed at telemedicine centres. Doctors in cities can monitor patients in real time through an Internet connection that runs on bandwidth as low as 32 kbps.

It had the technology, but the company needed support from VenturEast’s biotech fund to make the business take off. The latter obliged by providing seed funding of just under $1 million in 2003. This was followed by a second investment in 2006. “For companies like us, working in the development sector, it’s always hard to find investors,” says Sameer Sawarkar, CEO of Neurosynaptics. VenturEast helped Neurosynaptics scale up to 130 such centres, costing roughly Rs 1 lakh each, and covering 10 villages in Uttar Pradesh. It is now readying for the next big leap of growth, but needs another round of funding. Sawarkar plans to start scaling up from April this year and set up 2,000 centres by the end of 2010 with a new investor’s support. “This is exactly how it should be,” says Sarath Naru, Managing Partner of VenturEast. “The initial period to stabilise the business model should be very slow (three years, on average), then the ramp-up needs to be fast.”


Aavishkaar India Micro Venture Capital

  • Fund size Rs 60 crore (approx $14 million)
  • Fund manager Aavishkaar Venture Management Services
  • Investment philosophy and focus To create sustainable change by increasing economic activity at the bottom of the pyramid and boosting the entrepreneurial spirit. Investments to date have focused heavily on the rural and agro technology sectors
  • Companies invested in 17
  • Fund-raising strategy Raising funds from commercial and social investors. This includes banks, foundations, Nabard (India’s apex rural bank), commercial organisations and retail individual Indian investors
  • Social good Vs financial profit Working with portfolio companies to provide services in rural areas as well as under-served regions

Vineet Rai, Founder, Aavishkaar Fund

“We believe we are creating the basis for others to invest in. These are emerging economy companies, not social businesses.”


Neurosynaptics broke even operationally last year. Sawarkar expects revenues to double this financial year and treble next year. Such growth would not have been possible without a socially inclined investor.

A similar story played out at Dial 1298, an ambulance services company. It started in 2005 with 10 ambulances, only in Mumbai. The fleet did not grow for two years, as the company fine-tuned its model. “Our proposition was not attractive for normal venture capital firms as we were mainly serving a social cause,” says Sweta Mangal, CEO. Enter Acumen, with a $1.5 million investment. Since then (2007), the fleet has increased to 70, and now covers Mumbai, Patna and Kerala. “Acumen connected us to people from the UK and US to help us through their networks. They identified our work and put us on a pedestal for the whole world to see,” says Mangal. For entrepreneurs like Mangal, it is easy to get lost in the day-to-day running of the business without investors like Acumen pushing them to think of the future.

Payback Is Essential

Undoubtedly, venture capitalists are adding value to social entrepreneurs. But this relationship will be sustainable only when the favour is returned. Most social investments eventually need to make financial returns. This happens only when the investor gets an exit either through an IPO or a buyout. So far, this has not happened. VenturEast’s Naru thinks it’s too early to expect an exit now. “It takes about 6-8 years to see an exit in companies like these,” says Naru, in reference to Neurosynaptics. Even mainstream venture capital takes 3-5 years for an exit, so social enterprises will need more time.


Gray Matters Capital

  • Fund size $12 million
  • Fund manager Arun Gore and Brian Cayce
  • Investment philosophy and focus To impact whole communities. Invests in the information, communication and technology space to bridge the urban-rural digital gap
  • Companies invested in 4
  • Fund-raising strategy A not-for-profit fund supported by foundations like Rockdale, Rockefeller and Global Investment Initiative, among others
  • Social good Vs financial profit Prioritises opportunities according to market demand and social impact

But most believe that profitable exits will happen one day. “No one is investing because their primary objective is social good,” argues Somak Ghosh, Group President, Corporate Finance and Development Banking, Yes Bank. “They are investing because they believe that one of the key drivers of the next phase of growth will come from businesses built around meeting a social need.”

Yes Bank started its Social Investment Bank (SIB) division in 2007 to offer advisory services to social enterprises and help them raise funds. SIB has raised $70 million for three companies and is about to close its fourth deal. It helped Gradatim, an IT company that manages microfinancial products, raise $3 million in December 2009 from NEA-Indo US Ventures. The latter is a mainstream venture capitalist with purely commercial objectives. “We have a responsibility to our investors and need to generate returns. If businesses (we invest in) happen to serve a social cause, then we are excited as well,” says Kumar Shiralagi, Managing Director of Indo US Ventures.

p

Posted via email from gopu's posterous